QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

This Article
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Dobson, A.
* Articles by Young, G.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Dobson, A.
* Articles by Young, G.
Related Collections
* Health Reform
* Legal/Regulatory Issues
* Medicaid
* State/Local Issues
Health Affairs, Vol 11, Issue 4, 72-94
Copyright © 1992 by Project HOPE


Journal Article

The role of federal waivers in the health policy process

A Dobson, D Moran, and G Young

Federal waiver programs enable states to bypass the requirements of federal programs such as Medicare and Medicaid to experiment with different ways of financing, organizing, and delivering health care. In tracking waiver activity from 1980 to 1990, the authors found that federal involvement with waivers lost momentum during the latter part of the 1980s, while state involvement increased. Three key issues dominate the discussion of waivers: administrative control, the role of the states, and the ability to evaluate demonstration waivers. Examination of the chronology of waiver activity suggests the emergence of a new era, wherein federal control reemerges as a way to counter the increased fragmentation of health policies among states. If this is the case, four areas need to be addressed: (1) balance of political and research objectives; (2) administrative flexibility for states; (3) careful scrutiny of rules; and (4) increased accountability. These recommendations can guide the federal government, with the states as partners, in its attempt to regain momentum in the use of waivers to expand the knowledge base.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
F. J. Thompson and C. Burke
Executive Federalism and Medicaid Demonstration Waivers: Implications for Policy and Democratic Process
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 2007; 32(6): 971 - 1004.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
R J Buchanan, S Wang, and H Ju
Analyses of the minimum data set: comparisons of nursing home residents with multiple sclerosis to other nursing home residents
Multiple Sclerosis, December 1, 2002; 8(6): 512 - 522.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
C. M. GROGAN
Federalism and Health Care Reform
American Behavioral Scientist, July 1, 1993; 36(6): 741 - 759.
[Abstract]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. K. Iglehart
Medicaid
N. Engl. J. Med., March 25, 1993; 328(12): 896 - 900.
[Full Text]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-1992 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies