This Article Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chirba-Martin, M. A. Articles by Brennan, T. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chirba-Martin, M. A. Articles by Brennan, T. A. Related Collections Business Of Health Health Reform Legal/Regulatory Issues State/Local Issues

Health Affairs, Vol 13, Issue 2, 142-156
Copyright © by Project HOPE

Journal Article

The critical role of ERISA in state health reform

Despite prominent roles for employers and state regulation in the Clinton administration's Health Security Act, relatively little attention has been accorded to the impact of federal preemption of state legislation through the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). As interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court, ERISA permits state regulation of insured employee health plans but otherwise preempts analogous regulation relating to self-insured benefit plans. This has prompted lower courts to find that hospital rate-setting legislation, regulation of preferred provider organizations (PPOs), and medical malpractice suits for utilization review decisions are preempted by ERISA. Several issues with major implications for health reform remain unresolved, such as the availability of ERISA preemption to self-insured health alliances and health maintenance organizations (HMOs).

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Blumenthal Employer-sponsored health insurance in the United States--origins and implications. N. Engl. J. Med., July 6, 2006; 355(1): 82 - 88. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. K. Mariner Independent External Review of Health Maintenance Organizations' Medical-Necessity Decisions N. Engl. J. Med., December 26, 2002; 347(26): 2178 - 2182. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D. Jacobson and S. D. Pomfret ERISA Litigation and Physician Autonomy JAMA, February 16, 2000; 283(7): 921 - 926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Studdert and T. A. Brennan The Problems with Punitive Damages in Lawsuits against Managed-Care Organizations N. Engl. J. Med., January 27, 2000; 342(4): 280 - 284. [Full Text]

				S. GIAIMO and P. MANOW Adapting the Welfare State: The Case of Health Care Reform in Britain, Germany, and the United States Comparative Political Studies, December 1, 1999; 32(8): 967 - 1000. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Gottschalk The Missing Millions: Organized Labor, Business, and the Defeat of Clinton's Health Security Act Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(3): 489 - 529. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. A. Noble and T. A. Brennan The Stages of Managed Care Regulation: Developing Better Rules Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(6): 1275 - 1304. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. A. Paul-Shaheen The States and Health Care Reform: The Road Traveled and Lessons Learned from Seven That Took the Lead Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1998; 23(2): 319 - 361. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. K. Mariner State Regulation of Managed Care and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act N. Engl. J. Med., December 26, 1996; 335(26): 1986 - 1991. [Full Text]