This Article Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (36) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Frank, R. G. Articles by McGuire, T. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Frank, R. G. Articles by McGuire, T. G. Related Collections Health Reform Legal/Regulatory Issues Managed Care - Mental Health Mental Health/Substance Abuse

Health Affairs, Vol 16, Issue 4, 108-119
Copyright © 1997 by Project HOPE

Journal Article

The politics and economics of mental health 'parity' laws

The enactment of the Domenici-Wellstone amendment in September 1996, which calls for the elimination of certain limits on coverage for mental health care under private insurance, is being hailed as a major step forward in the quest for "parity" in mental health coverage. Parity legislation is being introduced in a number of state legislatures and is finding new enthusiasm in Congress. In this paper we consider the efficiency rationale for these laws and examine their likely impact in the era of managed care. We conclude that although such successes represent important political events, they may offer only small gains in the efficiency and fairness of insurance markets.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Hodgkin, C. M. Horgan, D. W. Garnick, and E. L. Merrick Cost Sharing for Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services in Managed Care Plans Med Care Res Rev, March 1, 2003; 60(1): 101 - 116. [Abstract] [PDF]