This Article Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (72) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Newhouse, J. P. Articles by Chapman, J. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Newhouse, J. P. Articles by Chapman, J. D. Related Collections Health Reform Managed Care Managed Care - Medicare

Health Affairs, Vol 16, Issue 5, 26-43
Copyright © 1997 by Project HOPE

Journal Article

Risk adjustment and Medicare: taking a closer look

Medicare's method for reimbursing at-risk managed care plans causes potential problems with selection (when beneficiaries with higher-than-expected costs stay in traditional plans) and stinting (the tendency to underprovide health services). Adjusting payment by diagnosis offers substantial improvement. We favor large-scale demonstrations of diagnosis-based reimbursement. Reducing payment, a Clinton administration proposal, would recoup excess payments in the short run but not address the selection problem, which could reemerge. Selection makes current payments vulnerable to upward spirals. We propose not using traditional Medicare to update reimbursement. Basing some payment on enrollees' actual use addresses selection and stinting. Rather than reinsurance, we propose blending traditional Medicare and risk-adjusted capitation. Ceding some cases to traditional Medicare in advance appears to be useful for terminally ill patients.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Donohue Mental health in the medicare part d drug benefit: a new regulatory model? Health Aff., May 1, 2006; 25(3): 707 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. E. Landon, A. M. Zaslavsky, and P. D. Cleary Fee-for-Service vs Managed Care Medicine--Reply JAMA, July 14, 2004; 292(2): 170 - 170. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. E. Landon, A. M. Zaslavsky, S. L. Bernard, M. J. Cioffi, and P. D. Cleary Comparison of Performance of Traditional Medicare vs Medicare Managed Care JAMA, April 14, 2004; 291(14): 1744 - 1752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. White Targets and Systems of Health Care Cost Control Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(4): 653 - 696. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. White Choice, Trust, and Two Models of Quality Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(5): 993 - 999. [PDF]