This Article Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (33) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Klein, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Klein, R. Related Collections International Issues

Health Affairs, Vol 17, Issue 4, 111-125
Copyright © 1998 by Project HOPE

Journal Article

Why Britain is reorganizing its national health service--yet again

The Labour government's 1997 plans for Britain's National Health Service (NHS) have been presented as a reaction to the reforms introduced by its Conservative predecessor in 1991. But to a large extent they build on the Conservative legacy. The centerpiece of the Labour reform--managed care organizations based on groups of primary care physicians--is based on the Conservative experiment with general practitioner fund holding. Welcomed when published, Labour's plans may arouse opposition in implementation, for they imply greater central control and threaten medical autonomy. If the political costs are to be contained, Labour may have to choose between increasing spending on the NHS or making concessions to the medical profession--and quite possibly have to do both.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. L. Maddox General Practice Fundholding in the British National Health Service Reform, 1991 1997:GP Accounts of the Dynamics of Change Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(4): 815 - 834. [PDF]