This Article
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Berenson, R. A.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Berenson, R. A.
Related Collections
* Managed Care - Quality
Health Affairs, Vol 17, Issue 6, 128-137
Copyright © 1998 by Project HOPE


Health Tracking

Bringing collaboration into the market paradigm

R A Berenson

The market competition paradigm assumes that health plans will compete on many factors, including quality of care. Unfortunately, for many reasons health plans have not made a substantial effort to distinguish themselves on quality. The antitrust laws that are designed to protect competition allow selective collaboration among competitors for various purposes, including quality improvement. Within antitrust constraints, specific opportunities exist for competing health plans to collaborate to improve quality. Their success will depend on purchasers' ability to demand such collaborative efforts as part of their overall purchasing strategy.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
S. Page
How Physicians' Organizations Compete: Protectionism and Efficiency
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, February 1, 2004; 29(1): 75 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]