This Article Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Buchmueller, T. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Buchmueller, T. C. Related Collections Insurance Coverage

Health Affairs, Vol 17, Issue 6, 228-235
Copyright © 1998 by Project HOPE

DataWatch

Does a fixed-dollar premium contribution lower spending?

In a multiple-option health benefits program, the employer's premium contribution determines the incentives facing employees and participating health plans. Advocates of managed contribution argue that a fixed-dollar contribution policy will result in lower health spending by encouraging cost-conscious choices by employees and price competition among plans. The University of California (UC), which adopted a fixed-dollar contribution policy in 1994, provides a useful case study for assessing this claim. This DataWatch documents the effect of this policy on health maintenance organization (HMO) premiums and per employee health spending in the UC health benefits program.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Rice and K. A. Desmond The Distributional Consequences of a Medicare Premium Support Proposal Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 2004; 29(6): 1187 - 1226. [Abstract] [PDF]