This Article
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Web of Science (38)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Le Grand, J.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Le Grand, J.
Related Collections
* International Issues
Health Affairs, Vol 18, Issue 3, 27-39
Copyright © 1999 by Project HOPE


Journal Article

Competition, cooperation, or control? Tales from the British National Health Service

J Le Grand

The British National Health Service (NHS) recently underwent a massive social experiment, inspired in large part by the ideas of U.S. experts. This involved the creation of an internal or quasi-market, separating purchaser from provider and encouraging competition among providers. After reviewing the evidence concerning the impact of this experiment, I conclude that the impact in fact was minimal, partly because of the retention of central government control and partly because the experiment was based on an inadequate understanding of professional and managerial motivations. The paper draws out general lessons of the experiment for other market-oriented health care systems and examines whether the lessons are reflected in the new batch of NHS reforms initiated by the recently elected Labour Government.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
H. K. Anheier
What Kind of Nonprofit Sector, What Kind of Society?: Comparative Policy Reflections
American Behavioral Scientist, March 1, 2009; 52(7): 1082 - 1094.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
N. Edwards and R. Lewis
Who owns and operates healthcare providers and does it matter?
J R Soc Med, February 1, 2008; 101(2): 54 - 58.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. Fotaki
Choice is yours: A psychodynamic exploration of health policymaking and its consequences for the English National Health Service
Human Relations, December 1, 2006; 59(12): 1711 - 1744.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
N. Edwards
Using markets to reform health care
BMJ, December 17, 2005; 331(7530): 1464 - 1466.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
C. Donaldson and D. Ruta
Should the NHS follow the American way?
BMJ, December 3, 2005; 331(7528): 1328 - 1330.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
M. Laugesen
Why some market reforms lack legitimacy in health care.
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 2005; 30(6): 1065 - 1100.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
C. Smee
United Kingdom
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, October 1, 2000; 25(5): 945 - 951.
[PDF]


Home page
Policy Politics Nursing PracticeHome page
D. Hennessy
Health Policy and the Position of Nursing Leadership in the United Kingdom: A Few Perspectives
Policy Politics Nursing Practice, May 1, 2000; 1(2): 107 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]