QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

This Article
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Feldman, R. D.
* Articles by Christianson, J. B.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Feldman, R. D.
* Articles by Christianson, J. B.
Related Collections
* Managed Care
* State/Local Issues
Health Affairs, Vol 18, Issue 4, 96-104
Copyright © 1999 by Project HOPE


Health Tracking

HMO consolidations: how national mergers affect local markets

R D Feldman, D R Wholey, and J B Christianson

The health maintenance organization (HMO) industry has undergone a wave of national consolidations in recent years. The most notable among these were between United HealthCare and MetraHealth (1995), PacifiCare Health Systems and FHP International (1996), Aetna Life and Casualty and U.S. Healthcare (1996), and Aetna and Prudential's health care unit (1999). This paper examines HMO consolidation from 1994 to 1997, looking first at concentration at the national level and then at the consequences of national consolidations for local markets. Whereas earlier mergers may have caused only a small increase in the type of local market concentration that may increase prices, later and currently proposed mergers may be motivated by considerations of increasing local market concentration. However, the concentration-increasing effect of national mergers was offset by the concentration-decreasing effect of HMO entry and growth. The analyses suggest that antitrust policy still has a role to play in ensuring that HMO markets remain open to new entry and in evaluating the effect of national mergers on local market concentration.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
M. E. Matheny, L. Ohno-Machado, and F. S. Resnic
Monitoring Device Safety in Interventional Cardiology
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2006; 13(2): 180 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
J. M. Grossman and P. B. Ginsburg
As The Health Insurance Underwriting Cycle Turns: What Next?
Health Aff., November 1, 2004; 23(6): 91 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
R. A. Deyo
Gaps, Tensions, and Conflicts in the FDA Approval Process: Implications for Clinical Practice
J Am Board Fam Med, March 1, 2004; 17(2): 142 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-1999 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies