This Article Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (25) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Christianson, J. Articles by Drury, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Christianson, J. Articles by Drury, P. Related Collections Insurance - Business Coalitions State/Local Issues

Health Affairs, Vol 18, Issue 6, 100-114
Copyright © 1999 by Project HOPE

Journal Article

Early experience with a new model of employer group purchasing in Minnesota

The Buyers Health Care Action Group (BHCAG) in the Twin Cities has implemented a new purchasing initiative that offers employees a choice among care systems with nonoverlapping networks of primary care providers. These systems offer a standardized benefit package, submit annual bids, and are paid on a risk-adjusted basis. Employees are provided with information on quality and other differences among systems, and most have financial incentives to choose lower-cost systems. Generally, providers have responded favorably to direct contracting and to risk-adjusted payments but have concerns about the risk-adjustment mechanism used and, more importantly, the strength of employers' commitment to the purchasing model.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. P. Scanlon, J. B. Christianson, and E. W. Ford Hospital Responses to the Leapfrog Group in Local Markets Med Care Res Rev, April 1, 2008; 65(2): 207 - 231. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Town, D. R. Wholey, J. Kralewski, and B. Dowd Assessing the Influence of Incentives on Physicians and Medical Groups Med Care Res Rev, September 1, 2004; 61(3_suppl): 80S - 118S. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. A. Fishman, M. C. Hornbrook, R. T. Meenan, and M. J. Goodman Opportunities and Challenges for Measuring Cost, Quality, and Clinical Effectiveness in Health Care Med Care Res Rev, September 1, 2004; 61(3_suppl): 124S - 143S. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. G. Saver Commentary on "Opportunities and Challenges for Measuring Cost, Quality, and Clinical Effectiveness in Health Care": The Fault Lies Not in our Stars but in Our System Med Care Res Rev, September 1, 2004; 61(3_suppl): 151S - 160S. [PDF]

				G. J. Bazzoli Medical Service Risk and the Evolution of Provider Compensation Arrangements Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, October 1, 2001; 26(5): 1003 - 1018. [PDF]

				L. Casalino Managing Uncertainty: Intermediate Organizations as Triple Agents Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, October 1, 2001; 26(5): 1055 - 1068. [PDF]

				E C Schneider and T Lieberman Publicly disclosed information about the quality of health care: response of the US public Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2001; 10(2): 96 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Fraser and P. McNamara Employers: Quality Takers or Quality Makers? Med Care Res Rev, November 1, 2000; 57(3_suppl): 33 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF]