QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

This Article
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Web of Science (15)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Titlow, K.
* Articles by Emanuel, E. J.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Titlow, K.
* Articles by Emanuel, E. J.
Related Collections
* Insurance Coverage
* Pharmaceuticals
Health Affairs, Vol 19, Issue 2, 240-247
Copyright © 2000 by Project HOPE


DataWatch

Drug coverage decisions: the role of dollars and values

K Titlow, L Randel, C M Clancy, and E J Emanuel

Given the increasing costs of pharmaceuticals today, it is important to understand how pharmacy benefits decisions are made and the role of cost and values in these decisions. This study examines what coverage decisions insurers make and the information and processes used in making these decisions. Fifty-three organizations, differing in size, tax status, and region, were asked about their policies for four new and controversial drugs: Viagra, Enbrel, Zyban, and Celebrex. Enbrel and Celebrex were much more likely to be covered than Viagra and Zyban. In addition, coverage of Enbrel and Celebrex was limited through strategies such as prior authorization, to encourage medically appropriate use of these agents, whereas coverage of Viagra and Zyban was limited predominantly through generalized exclusion or through restrictions on quantity or duration of use. Value judgments, rather than cost, seem to play a central, though largely unspoken, role in these coverage decisions.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
K. Sepucha and A. G. Mulley Jr
A Perspective on the Patient's Role in Treatment Decisions
Med Care Res Rev, February 1, 2009; 66(1_suppl): 53S - 74S.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
P. D. Jacobson and M. L. Kanna
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the Courts: Recent Trends and Future Prospects
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, April 1, 2001; 26(2): 291 - 326.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2000 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies