This Article Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hoag, S. Articles by Thornton, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hoag, S. Articles by Thornton, C. Related Collections Managed Care Managed Care - Medicaid Mental Health/Substance Abuse State/Local Issues

Health Affairs, Vol 19, Issue 4, 121-133
Copyright © 2000 by Project HOPE

Journal Article

Setting rates for Medicaid managed behavioral health care: lessons learned

This paper reviews Tennessee's experience setting, monitoring, and updating capitation rates for Medicaid managed behavioral health care, and draws lessons from those experiences for other states. Our review of assumptions about four components of Tennessee's rate-setting process--data, benefit design, savings expectations, and processes for monitoring and updating rates--suggests that the initial rate established by Tennessee was inadequate, and its inadequacy resulted primarily from the way available information was used to set the rate, rather than from the method of rate setting selected. Tennessee's experiences illustrate how difficult rate setting is and illuminate several key lessons about the rate-setting process.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. J. Conover, P. J. Rankin, and F. A. Sloan Effects of Tennessee Medicaid Managed Care On Obstetrical Care and Birth Outcomes Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 2001; 26(6): 1291 - 1324. [Abstract] [PDF]