This Article Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dowd, B. Articles by Feldman, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dowd, B. Articles by Feldman, R. Related Collections Health Reform Managed Care Managed Care - Medicare

Health Affairs, Vol 19, Issue 5, 9-29
Copyright © 2000 by Project HOPE

Journal Article

A tale of four cities: Medicare reform and competitive pricing

The current payment system for Medicare + Choice (M + C) plans is based on prices calculated from administrative records. This system has been criticized as arbitrary, inefficient, and unfair. Most Medicare reform proposals would replace the current payment system with some form of competitive pricing. However, efforts over the past five years to demonstrate competitive pricing for M + C plans have been blocked repeatedly by Congress, even when the demonstrations were directly responsive to a congressional mandate. In the absence of political support, a demonstration of competitive pricing may be infeasible, and Congress could be forced to take the risky step of implementing broad Medicare reforms with very little information about their effects.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. A. Berenson From Politics To Policy: A New Payment Approach In Medicare Advantage Health Aff., March 1, 2008; 27(2): w156 - w164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Cawley and A. B. Whitford Improving the Design of Competitive Bidding in Medicare Advantage Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, April 1, 2007; 32(2): 317 - 347. [Abstract] [PDF]