| |
Patterns Of Insurance Coverage Within Families With Children
Karla L. Hanson
This paper examines patterns of health insurance within families with children, using the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Four and a half million families (14 percent) had insurance for some, but not all, family members. These partially insured families generally obtained coverage because of one of three situations: (1) A parent earned relatively higher wages and received the concomitant benefits of such jobs but could not afford dependent coverage; (2) the family had young children who were covered by Medicaid through more generous eligibility thresholds for children under age six, while other family members were ineligible; or (3) the family had a member who was eligible for public coverage because of a disability. Each of these situations offers the platform from which incremental policies might efficiently expand coverage to families.

What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. B. Nielsen and S. Garasky
Health Insurance Stability and Health Status: Do Family-Level Coverage Patterns Matter?
Journal of Family Issues,
November 1, 2008;
29(11):
1471 - 1491.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Vistnes and B. S. Schone
Pathways To Coverage: The Changing Roles Of Public And Private Sources
Health Aff.,
January 1, 2008;
27(1):
44 - 57.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. B. Mitchell, S. G. Haber, and S. Hoover
Premium Subsidy Programs: Who Enrolls, And How Do They Fare?
Health Aff.,
September 1, 2005;
24(5):
1344 - 1355.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|