Health Affairs

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Barneveld, E. M. Articles by van de Ven, W. P.M.M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Barneveld, E. M. Articles by van de Ven, W. P.M.M. Related Collections International Issues

DataWatch

Risk Sharing Between Competing Health Plans And Sponsors

Erik M. van Barneveld, René C.J.A. van Vliet and Wynand P.M.M. van de Ven

In many countries, competing health plans receive capitation payments from a sponsor, whether government or a private employer. All capitation payment methods are far from perfect and have raised concerns about risk selection. Paying health plans partly on the basis of capitation and partly on the basis of actual costs ("risk sharing") reduces plans’ incentives for selection but sacrifices some incentives for efficiency. This paper summarizes our empirical research on Dutch health plans with respect to various forms of risk sharing. All sponsors can improve their payment systems by either implementing or changing their form of risk sharing.

                      What's this?