QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Casalino, L.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Casalino, L.
Related Collections
* State/Local Issues - California
* Managed Care
* Physicians
* State/Local Issues
* Workforce Issues

The California Model

Canaries In A Coal Mine: California Physician Groups And Competition

Lawrence Casalino

Health care organizations may compete by developing organized processes to improve quality and increase efficiency, or may focus on growing to increase negotiating leverage and on controlling costs through withholding appropriate care and avoiding sick patients. This paper describes key ways in which public and private policy decisions create incentives that influence the competitive focus of physician groups in California, a state in which physician groups and health maintenance organizations are prevalent. These policies do not manage competition in optimal ways: They reward groups for market leverage and controlling costs while failing to fully reward quality and efficiency.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
B. G. Saver
Commentary on "Opportunities and Challenges for Measuring Cost, Quality, and Clinical Effectiveness in Health Care": The Fault Lies Not in our Stars but in Our System
Med Care Res Rev, September 1, 2004; 61(3_suppl): 151S - 160S.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
K. Kronebusch and B. Elbel
Enrolling Children in Public Insurance: SCHIP, Medicaid, and State Implementation
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 2004; 29(3): 451 - 490.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
K. Kronebusch and B. Elbel
Simplifying Children's Medicaid And SCHIP
Health Aff., May 1, 2004; 23(3): 233 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
S. Page
How Physicians' Organizations Compete: Protectionism and Efficiency
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, February 1, 2004; 29(1): 75 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
C. Grogan and E. Patashnik
Between Welfare Medicine and Mainstream Entitlement: Medicaid at the Political Crossroads
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, October 1, 2003; 28(5): 821 - 858.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. A. Ganz, M. M. Farmer, M. Belman, J. L. Malin, R. Bastani, K. L. Kahn, A. Dietrich, and J. Fielding
Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in a Managed Care Health Plan: Recruitment of Provider Organizations for a Randomized Effectiveness Trial
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2003; 12(9): 824 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2001 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies