| |
Paying For National Health InsuranceAnd Not Getting It
Steffie Woolhandler and
David U. Himmelstein
The threat of steep tax hikes has torpedoed the debate over national health insurance. Yet according to our calculations, the current tax-financed share of health spending is far higher than most people think: 59.8 percent. This figure (which is about fifteen percentage points higher than the official Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS] estimate) includes health carerelated tax subsidies and public employees health benefits, neither of which are classified as public expenditures in the CMS accounting framework. U.S. tax-financed health spending is now the highest in the world. Indeed, our tax-financed costs exceed total costs in every nation except Switzerland. But the sub rosa character of much tax-financed health spending in the United States obscures its regressivity. Public spending for care of the poor, elderly, and disabled is hotly debated and intensely scrutinized. But tax subsidies that accrue mostly to the affluent and health benefits for middle-class government workers are mostly below the radar screen. National health insurance would require smaller tax increases than most people imagine and would make governments role in financing care more visible and explicit.

What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. U. Himmelstein, S. Woolhandler, J. C. Goodman, and R. M. Sade
Our Health Care System at the Crossroads: Single Payer or Market Reform?
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
November 1, 2007;
84(5):
1435 - 1446.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. K. Galbraith
What is the American model really about?: Soft budgets and the Keynesian Devolution
Ind. Corp. Change,
February 1, 2007;
16(1):
1 - 18.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. C. Fleming
My Right Knee
Ann Intern Med,
August 2, 2005;
143(3):
237 - 237.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Spitz and J. Abramson
When Health Policy Is the Problem: A Report from the Field
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law,
June 1, 2005;
30(3):
327 - 366.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. E. Clarke, M. Petri, S. Manzi, D. A. Isenberg, C. Gordon, J.-L. Senecal, J. Penrod, L. Joseph, Y. St Pierre, P. R. Fortin, et al.
The systemic lupus erythematosus Tri-nation Study: absence of a link between health resource use and health outcome
Rheumatology,
August 1, 2004;
43(8):
1016 - 1024.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Geyman
The Corporate Transformation of Medicine and Its Impact on Costs and Access to Care
J Am Board Fam Med,
September 1, 2003;
16(5):
443 - 454.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
The Physicians' Working Group for Single-Payer Nat
Proposal of the Physicians' Working Group for Single-Payer National Health Insurance
JAMA,
August 13, 2003;
290(6):
798 - 805.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. McCanne
Why Incremental Reforms Will Not Solve the Health Care Crisis
J Am Board Fam Med,
May 1, 2003;
16(3):
257 - 261.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. White
Three Meanings of Capacity; Or, Why the Federal Government Is Most Likely to Lead on Insurance Access Issues
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law,
April 1, 2003;
28(2-3):
217 - 244.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Bitton and J. G. Kahn
Government Share of Health Care Expenditures
JAMA,
March 5, 2003;
289(9):
1165 - 1165.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. U. Himmelstein and S. Woolhandler
National Health Insurance or Incremental Reform: Aim High, or at Our Feet?
Am J Public Health,
January 1, 2003;
93(1):
102 - 105.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|