This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Web of Science (35)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Woolhandler, S.
* Articles by Himmelstein, D. U.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Woolhandler, S.
* Articles by Himmelstein, D. U.
Related Collections
* Health Reform
* Insurance Coverage
* Health Spending
* Politics

Health Care Costs

Paying For National Health Insurance—And Not Getting It

Steffie Woolhandler and David U. Himmelstein

The threat of steep tax hikes has torpedoed the debate over national health insurance. Yet according to our calculations, the current tax-financed share of health spending is far higher than most people think: 59.8 percent. This figure (which is about fifteen percentage points higher than the official Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS] estimate) includes health care–related tax subsidies and public employees’ health benefits, neither of which are classified as public expenditures in the CMS accounting framework. U.S. tax-financed health spending is now the highest in the world. Indeed, our tax-financed costs exceed total costs in every nation except Switzerland. But the sub rosa character of much tax-financed health spending in the United States obscures its regressivity. Public spending for care of the poor, elderly, and disabled is hotly debated and intensely scrutinized. But tax subsidies that accrue mostly to the affluent and health benefits for middle-class government workers are mostly below the radar screen. National health insurance would require smaller tax increases than most people imagine and would make government’s role in financing care more visible and explicit.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. S. Ross and A. S. Detsky
Comparison of the US and Canadian Health Care Systems: A Tale of 2 Mount Sinai's
JAMA, October 22, 2008; 300(16): 1934 - 1936.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med PhilosHome page
R. M. Sade
Foundational Ethics of the Health Care System: The Moral and Practical Superiority of Free Market Reforms
J Med Philos, October 1, 2008; 33(5): 461 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
T. M. Selden and M. Sing
The Distribution Of Public Spending For Health Care In The United States, 2002
Health Aff., September 1, 2008; 27(5): w349 - w359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
D. U. Himmelstein and S. Woolhandler
National Health Insurance or Incremental Reform: Aim High, or at Our Feet?
Am J Public Health, September 1, 2008; 98(Supplement_1): S65 - S68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
J. S. Hacker
Putting Politics First
Health Aff., May 1, 2008; 27(3): 718 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. U. Himmelstein, S. Woolhandler, J. C. Goodman, and R. M. Sade
Our Health Care System at the Crossroads: Single Payer or Market Reform?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2007; 84(5): 1435 - 1446.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ind Corp ChangeHome page
J. K. Galbraith
What is the American model really about?: Soft budgets and the Keynesian Devolution
Ind. Corp. Change, February 1, 2007; 16(1): 1 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
K. C. Fleming
My Right Knee
Ann Intern Med, August 2, 2005; 143(3): 237 - 237.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
B. Spitz and J. Abramson
When Health Policy Is the Problem: A Report from the Field
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 2005; 30(3): 327 - 366.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
A. E. Clarke, M. Petri, S. Manzi, D. A. Isenberg, C. Gordon, J.-L. Senecal, J. Penrod, L. Joseph, Y. St Pierre, P. R. Fortin, et al.
The systemic lupus erythematosus Tri-nation Study: absence of a link between health resource use and health outcome
Rheumatology, August 1, 2004; 43(8): 1016 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
J. P. Geyman
The Corporate Transformation of Medicine and Its Impact on Costs and Access to Care
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2003; 16(5): 443 - 454.
[Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
The Physicians' Working Group for Single-Payer Nat
Proposal of the Physicians' Working Group for Single-Payer National Health Insurance
JAMA, August 13, 2003; 290(6): 798 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
D. McCanne
Why Incremental Reforms Will Not Solve the Health Care Crisis
J Am Board Fam Med, May 1, 2003; 16(3): 257 - 261.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
J. White
Three Meanings of Capacity; Or, Why the Federal Government Is Most Likely to Lead on Insurance Access Issues
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, April 1, 2003; 28(2-3): 217 - 244.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. Bitton and J. G. Kahn
Government Share of Health Care Expenditures
JAMA, March 5, 2003; 289(9): 1165 - 1165.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
D. U. Himmelstein and S. Woolhandler
National Health Insurance or Incremental Reform: Aim High, or at Our Feet?
Am J Public Health, January 1, 2003; 93(1): 102 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]