Health Affairs, 22, no. 1 (2003): 31-44 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.1.31 © 2003 by Project HOPE	New Online   Pay Cuts For Medicare Docs   Access To Care Woes   Public Coverage More Efficient   Empowering Consumers

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brown, L. D. Articles by Sparer, M. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Brown, L. D. Articles by Sparer, M. S. Related Collections Health Reform Managed Care - Medicaid Managed Care - Medicare Medicaid Politics

Medicaid

Poor Program’s Progress: The Unanticipated Politics Of Medicaid Policy

Advocates of U.S. national health insurance tend to share an image that highlights universal standards of coverage, social insurance financing, and national administration—in short, the basic features of Medicare. Such an approach is said to be good (equitable and efficient) policy and equally good politics. Medicaid, by contrast, is often taken to exemplify poor policy and poorer politics: means-tested eligibility, general revenue financing, and federal/state administration, which encourage inequities and disparities of care. This stark juxtaposition fails, however, to address important counterintuitive elements in the political evolution of these programs. Medicare’s benefits and beneficiaries have stayed disturbingly stable, but Medicaid’s relatively broad benefits have held firm, and its categories of beneficiaries have expanded. Repeated alarms about "bankruptcy" have undermined confidence in Medicare’s trust funding, while Medicaid’s claims on the taxpayer’s dollar have worn well. Medicare’s national administration has avoided disparities, but at the price of sacrificing state and local flexibility that can ease such "reforms" as the introduction of managed care. That Medicaid has fared better than a "poor people’s program" supposedly could has provocative implications for health reform debates.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Goldfield, R. Averill, R. Fuller, and J. Vertrees A Response to the Prometheus Proposal--Well Intended but Impossible to Implement American Journal of Medical Quality, April 1, 2008; 23(2): 85 - 89. [PDF]

				S. Y. Sessions and P. R. Lee A Road Map for Universal Coverage: Finding a Pass through the Financial Mountains Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 2008; 33(2): 155 - 197. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Schlesinger and J. S. Hacker Secret Weapon: The "New" Medicare as a Route to Health Security Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, April 1, 2007; 32(2): 247 - 291. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. J. Thompson and C. Burke Executive Federalism and Medicaid Demonstration Waivers: Implications for Policy and Democratic Process Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 2007; 32(6): 971 - 1004. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. M. Sage and D. N. Kalyan Horses or Unicorns: Can Paying for Performance Make Quality Competition Routine? Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 2006; 31(3): 531 - 556. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. G. Frank and S. Glied Changes in mental health financing since 1971: implications for policymakers and patients. Health Aff., May 1, 2006; 25(3): 601 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. D. Brown Impermanent Politics: The Hillsborough County Health Care Plan And Community Innovation For The Uninsured Health Aff., May 1, 2006; 25(3): w162 - w172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D. Jacobson Health Law 2005: An Agenda J. Law Med. Ethics, December 1, 2005; 33(4): 725 - 738. [PDF]

				R. P. Nathan Federalism And Health Policy Health Aff., November 1, 2005; 24(6): 1458 - 1466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Mello, D. M. Studdert, and T. A. Brennan The Pharmaceutical Industry versus Medicaid -- Limits on State Initiatives to Control Prescription-Drug Costs N. Engl. J. Med., February 5, 2004; 350(6): 608 - 613. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. K. Iglehart The Dilemma of Medicaid N. Engl. J. Med., May 22, 2003; 348(21): 2140 - 2148. [Full Text] [PDF]