QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 22, no. 3 (2003): 134-148
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.3.134
© 2003 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Pay Cuts For Medicare Docs
 * Access To Care Woes
 * Public Coverage More Efficient
 * Empowering Consumers
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (24)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Marshall, M. N.
* Articles by Smith, P. C.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Marshall, M. N.
* Articles by Smith, P. C.
Related Collections
* Consumer Issues
* International Issues
* Quality Of Care

International Comparisons

Public Reporting On Quality In The United States And The United Kingdom

Martin N. Marshall, Paul G. Shekelle, Huw T.O. Davies and Peter C. Smith

The public reporting of comparative information about health care quality is becoming an accepted way of improving accountability and quality. Quality report cards have been prominent in the United States for more than a decade and are a central feature of British health system reform. In this paper we examine the common challenges and differences in implementation of the policy in the two countries. We use this information to explore some key questions relating to the content, target audience, and use of published information. We end by making specific recommendations for maximizing the effectiveness of public reporting.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
C. H. Fung, Y.-W. Lim, S. Mattke, C. Damberg, and P. G. Shekelle
Systematic Review: The Evidence That Publishing Patient Care Performance Data Improves Quality of Care
Ann Intern Med, January 15, 2008; 148(2): 111 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
A. T. Chien, M. H. Chin, A. M. Davis, and L. P. Casalino
Pay for Performance, Public Reporting, and Racial Disparities in Health Care: How Are Programs Being Designed?
Med Care Res Rev, October 1, 2007; 64(5_suppl): 283S - 304S.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
E. Moy, E. Dayton, and C. M. Clancy
Compiling The Evidence: The National Healthcare Disparities Reports
Health Aff., March 1, 2005; 24(2): 376 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
M Marshall and P Smith
Rewarding results: using financial incentives to improve quality
Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2003; 12(6): 397 - 398.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2003 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies