| |
International Comparisons |
Public Reporting On Quality In The United States And The United Kingdom
Martin N. Marshall,
Paul G. Shekelle,
Huw T.O. Davies and
Peter C. Smith
The public reporting of comparative information about health care quality is becoming an accepted way of improving accountability and quality. Quality report cards have been prominent in the United States for more than a decade and are a central feature of British health system reform. In this paper we examine the common challenges and differences in implementation of the policy in the two countries. We use this information to explore some key questions relating to the content, target audience, and use of published information. We end by making specific recommendations for maximizing the effectiveness of public reporting.

What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. H. Fung, Y.-W. Lim, S. Mattke, C. Damberg, and P. G. Shekelle
Systematic Review: The Evidence That Publishing Patient Care Performance Data Improves Quality of Care
Ann Intern Med,
January 15, 2008;
148(2):
111 - 123.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. T. Chien, M. H. Chin, A. M. Davis, and L. P. Casalino
Pay for Performance, Public Reporting, and Racial Disparities in Health Care: How Are Programs Being Designed?
Med Care Res Rev,
October 1, 2007;
64(5_suppl):
283S - 304S.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Moy, E. Dayton, and C. M. Clancy
Compiling The Evidence: The National Healthcare Disparities Reports
Health Aff.,
March 1, 2005;
24(2):
376 - 387.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M Marshall and P Smith
Rewarding results: using financial incentives to improve quality
Qual. Saf. Health Care,
December 1, 2003;
12(6):
397 - 398.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|