QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 23, no. 1 (2004): 103-106
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.1.103
© 2004 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Senate Health Reform Bill
 * Rewarding Providers
 * Public Option Policy Brief
 * Health Reform & Abortion
 * Delivery System Reform
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Berndt, E. R.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Berndt, E. R.
Related Collections
* Medicare
* Pharmaceuticals
* Research And Technology

Medicare Challenge

PERSPECTIVE

Unique Issues Raised By Drug Benefit Design

Ernst R. Berndt

In this Perspective on the preceding paper by Joseph Newhouse, I point out a number of features of the pharmaceutical industry that differentiate it from other health care sectors. These differences help explain why it has proved to be so very difficult to construct policies that simultaneously contain health care costs, provide patients with high-quality care, and generate continued incentives for innovation. I then summarize Newhouse’s preferred Medicare prescription drug benefit program and the issues it raises.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?




Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2004 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies