| |
PERSPECTIVE
An Information Infrastructure For The Pharmaceutical Market
Uwe E. Reinhardt
The primary contribution of Joseph Newhouses paper is to make the point that it is impossible to devise a drug pricing policy that satisfies either the conditions for economic efficiency or prevailing standards of "fairness." Not specifically mentioned by Newhouse is a rule for the socially efficient outlays on selling and marketing by the pharmaceutical industry. In fact, it is not clear that the current allocation of the industrys revenue dollars to marketing and R&D is efficient from societys point of view. This paper explores this question and proposes an independent, publicly funded information infrastructure to study and disseminate results on pharmaceutical cost-effectiveness.

What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Emanuel, V. R. Fuchs, and A. M. Garber
Essential Elements of a Technology and Outcomes Assessment Initiative
JAMA,
September 19, 2007;
298(11):
1323 - 1325.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. R. Wilensky
Developing A Center For Comparative Effectiveness Information
Health Aff.,
November 1, 2006;
25(6):
w572 - w585.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Rosenheck
Outcomes, Costs, and Policy Caution: A Commentary on the Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS 1).
Arch Gen Psychiatry,
October 1, 2006;
63(10):
1074 - 1076.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Tunis and S. D. Pearson
Coverage Options For Promising Technologies: Medicare's 'Coverage With Evidence Development'
Health Aff.,
September 1, 2006;
25(5):
1218 - 1230.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. E. Reinhardt, P. S. Hussey, and G. F. Anderson
U.S. Health Care Spending In An International Context
Health Aff.,
May 1, 2004;
23(3):
10 - 25.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|