QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 23, no. 1 (2004): 107-112
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.1.107
© 2004 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * House Health Reform Bill
 * Paying for Reform
 * Vetting AHIP's Report
 * HIV/AIDS Costs
 * Brief: Insurance Reform
 * HA Blog Top 10
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Web of Science (17)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Reinhardt, U. E.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Reinhardt, U. E.
Related Collections
* Pharmaceuticals
* Research And Technology

Medicare Challenge

PERSPECTIVE

An Information Infrastructure For The Pharmaceutical Market

Uwe E. Reinhardt

The primary contribution of Joseph Newhouse’s paper is to make the point that it is impossible to devise a drug pricing policy that satisfies either the conditions for economic efficiency or prevailing standards of "fairness." Not specifically mentioned by Newhouse is a rule for the socially efficient outlays on selling and marketing by the pharmaceutical industry. In fact, it is not clear that the current allocation of the industry’s revenue dollars to marketing and R&D is efficient from society’s point of view. This paper explores this question and proposes an independent, publicly funded information infrastructure to study and disseminate results on pharmaceutical cost-effectiveness.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
E. J. Emanuel, V. R. Fuchs, and A. M. Garber
Essential Elements of a Technology and Outcomes Assessment Initiative
JAMA, September 19, 2007; 298(11): 1323 - 1325.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
G. R. Wilensky
Developing A Center For Comparative Effectiveness Information
Health Aff., November 1, 2006; 25(6): w572 - w585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
R. A. Rosenheck
Outcomes, Costs, and Policy Caution: A Commentary on the Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS 1).
Arch Gen Psychiatry, October 1, 2006; 63(10): 1074 - 1076.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
S. R. Tunis and S. D. Pearson
Coverage Options For Promising Technologies: Medicare's 'Coverage With Evidence Development'
Health Aff., September 1, 2006; 25(5): 1218 - 1230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
U. E. Reinhardt, P. S. Hussey, and G. F. Anderson
U.S. Health Care Spending In An International Context
Health Aff., May 1, 2004; 23(3): 10 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2004 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies