Health Affairs, 23, no. 1 (2004): 23-33
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.1.23
© 2004 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Getting Health Reform Done
 * After the State of the Union
 * Incremental Reform
 * E-Health in Developing World
 * Most-Read Articles in 2009
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Croghan, T. W.
* Articles by Pittman, P. M.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Croghan, T. W.
* Articles by Pittman, P. M.
Related Collections
* Pharmaceuticals
* Research And Technology
* Politics

Industry Priorities

The Medicine Cabinet: What’s In It, Why, And Can We Change The Contents?

Thomas W. Croghan and Patricia M. Pittman

The failure of the pharmaceutical industry to produce drugs for common chronic diseases, emerging diseases, and the potential threats of bioterrorism or the spread of tropical diseases contrasts sharply with the industry’s output of lifestyle and "me-too" drugs. In this paper we review the decision-making process that resulted in our current portfolio of medicines and offer several alternatives to better align business incentives with medical need.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?