Health Affairs, 23, no. 2 (2004): 29-42 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.29 © 2004 by Project HOPE	New Online   Obama's Success & Next Steps   3 Health Policy Options for President Obama   A Hybrid Proposal   Bipartisan Compromise

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Comments: View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bloche, M. G. Articles by Studdert, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bloche, M. G. Articles by Studdert, D. M. Related Collections Health Reform Legal/Regulatory Issues Managed Care Managed Care - Regulatory Issues

Managed Care

A Quiet Revolution: Law As An Agent Of Health System Change

This paper considers law’s impact on health system change. Federal courts and state regulators have remade the rules of the medical marketplace, restricting the methods available to managed care organizations to control costs. Legal conflict, however, has had a larger effect through its influence on market actors’ perceptions and expectations. In anticipation of adverse legal outcomes and in response to consumers’ and investors’ anxiety, health plans changed business strategies, backing away from aggressive cost management. We conclude with four lessons about law’s role in the health sphere—lessons that stress the power of legal conflict to shape perceptions and to thereby change behavior before legal change occurs.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. K. Mariner The Supreme Court's Limitation of Managed-Care Liability N. Engl. J. Med., September 23, 2004; 351(13): 1347 - 1352. [Full Text] [PDF]

Comments: