QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 23, no. 3 (2004): 155-166
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.155
© 2004 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * House Health Reform Bill
 * Paying for Reform
 * Vetting AHIP's Report
 * HIV/AIDS Costs
 * Brief: Insurance Reform
 * HA Blog Top 10
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Supplemental Exhibit
* Submit a response to this article
* Comments: View responses
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Web of Science (19)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Attaran, A.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Attaran, A.
Related Collections
* Health Reform
* AIDS/HIV
* International Issues
* Legal/Regulatory Issues
* Pharmaceuticals
* Research And Technology

Agreements

How Do Patents And Economic Policies Affect Access To Essential Medicines In Developing Countries?

Amir Attaran

This paper studies the relationship between patents and access to essential medicines. It finds that in sixty-five low- and middle-income countries, where four billion people live, patenting is rare for 319 products on the World Health Organization’s Model List of Essential Medicines. Only seventeen essential medicines are patentable, although usually not actually patented, so that overall patent incidence is low (1.4 percent) and concentrated in larger markets. This and other results shed light on the policy dialogue among public health activists, the pharmaceutical industry, and governments that is often based on mistaken premises about how patents affect corporate revenues or the health of the world’s poorest. Pragmatism and greater flexibility are urged, so that policy may better concentrate on the greater causes of epidemic mortality, which now pose unprecedented threats to global peace and security.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
J Sonderholm
Paying a high price for low costs: why there should be no legal constraints on the profits that can be made on drugs for tropical diseases
J. Med. Ethics, May 1, 2009; 35(5): 315 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Health EthicsHome page
D. Sridhar
Improving Access to Essential Medicines: How Health Concerns can be Prioritised in the Global Governance System
Public Health Ethics, July 1, 2008; 1(2): 83 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Health EthicsHome page
M. J. Selgelid
A Full-Pull Program for the Provision of Pharmaceuticals: Practical Issues
Public Health Ethics, July 1, 2008; 1(2): 134 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
D. B. Ridley, H. G. Grabowski, and J. L. Moe
Developing drugs for developing countries.
Health Aff., March 1, 2006; 25(2): 313 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. NewsHome page
K. Mulligan
Medicaid Embraces Managed Care As Private Insurers Turn Away
Psychiatr News, May 21, 2004; 39(10): 2 - 12.
[Full Text]

Comments:

Read all Comments

Patents And Access: Another Look
Connie Liu, et al.
Health Affairs, 11 May 2004 [Full text]


Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2004 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies