QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 23, no. 3 (2004): 269-276
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.269
© 2004 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * How Would Obama, McCain Cover The Uninsured?
 * Debating Cost Of Uninsured
 * Try Medicare-For-All
 * HA Blog Top 10
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Morgan, S.
* Articles by Mintzes, B.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Morgan, S.
* Articles by Mintzes, B.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Business Of Health
* Health Reform
* International Issues
* Pharmaceuticals
* Health Spending

UpDate

INTERNATIONAL REPORT

Outcomes-Based Drug Coverage in British Columbia

Steven Morgan, Ken Bassett and Barbara Mintzes

For the past decade the provincial drug plan in British Columbia has based the allocation of public subsidy on scientific standards of evidence. Coverage policies under B.C. PharmaCare are marked by the restriction of public subsidy until manufacturers provide valid evidence of a comparative health outcome advantage versus therapeutic alternatives. Implementing and maintaining such outcomes-based coverage policies has required a system of evidentiary review and support. Since 1994 the Therapeutics Initiative at the University of British Columbia has provided provincial decisionmakers with such support. We describe lessons from the B.C. experience for jurisdictions interested in basing coverage on evidence of proven comparative advantage for patients’ health.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
B. Mintzes
Direct to consumer advertising of prescription drugs
BMJ, September 2, 2008; 337(sep02_1): a985 - a985.
[Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. A. Jackevicius, J. V. Tu, J. S. Ross, D. T. Ko, and H. M. Krumholz
Use of Ezetimibe in the United States and Canada
N. Engl. J. Med., April 24, 2008; 358(17): 1819 - 1828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
J. M. Paterson, A. Laupacis, K. Bassett, G. M. Anderson, and for the BC-Ontario Pharmacosurveillance for Decisi
Using Pharmacoepidemiology To Inform Drug Coverage Policy: Initial Lessons From A Two-Province Collaborative
Health Aff., September 1, 2006; 25(5): 1436 - 1443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. Hsu, M. Price, J. Huang, R. Brand, V. Fung, R. Hui, B. Fireman, J. P. Newhouse, and J. V. Selby
Unintended consequences of caps on medicare drug benefits.
N. Engl. J. Med., June 1, 2006; 354(22): 2349 - 2359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
S. G. Morgan, M. McMahon, C. Mitton, E. Roughead, R. Kirk, P. Kanavos, and D. Menon
Centralized drug review processes in australia, Canada, new zealand, and the United kingdom.
Health Aff., March 1, 2006; 25(2): 337 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2004 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies