QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 23, no. 3 (2004): 56-67
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.56
© 2004 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * McAllen, TX & Beyond: An Expert Roundtable
 * Geography & Reform
 * Medicaid or Insurance Exchange?
 * Siren Song of New GME
 * Public Plan Option: Pro & Con
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Busse, R.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Busse, R.
Related Collections
* Health Reform
* Insurance Coverage
* International Issues
* Health Spending

Costs & Competition

Disease Management Programs In Germany’s Statutory Health Insurance System

Reinhard Busse

The introduction in 1996 of free choice among sickness funds in Germany was accompanied by a "risk structure compensation" (RSC) mechanism based on average spending by age and sex. Because chronically ill people were not adequately taken into account, competition for newly insured consumers concentrated on the healthy. The introduction in 2002 of disease management programs addresses this problem: Insured people in such programs are treated as a separate RSC category, making them a more "attractive" group that no longer generates a deficit. The degree of sickness fund activities and the fierce dispute with physicians are valid indicators that the incentives work.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
C. Schoen, R. Osborn, P. T. Huynh, M. Doty, J. Peugh, and K. Zapert
On The Front Lines Of Care: Primary Care Doctors' Office Systems, Experiences, And Views In Seven Countries
Health Aff., November 1, 2006; 25(6): w555 - w571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
M. A. Hall
The Death of Managed Care: A Regulatory Autopsy
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 2005; 30(3): 427 - 452.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
C. Altenstetter and R. Busse
Health Care Reform in Germany: Patchwork Change within Established Governance Structures
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, February 1, 2005; 30(1-2): 121 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. Maynard and K. Bloor
Reforming the consultant contract again?
BMJ, October 23, 2004; 329(7472): 929 - 930.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2004 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies