QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 23, no. 4 (2004): 167-175
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.4.167
© 2004 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * How Would Obama, McCain Cover The Uninsured?
 * Cost To Cover Uninsured
 * Let Health IT Market Evolve
 * How Rate Health IT Progress?
 * HIV/AIDS In India, China
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Monheit, A. C.
* Articles by Fox, K. S.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Monheit, A. C.
* Articles by Fox, K. S.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Business Of Health
* Consumer Issues
* Health Reform
* Insurance Coverage
* Insurance - Employer-Based System
* Legal/Regulatory Issues
* Safety-Net Systems
* State/Local Issues

Health Tracking

MARKETWATCH

Community Rating And Sustainable Individual Health Insurance Markets In New Jersey

Alan C. Monheit, Joel C. Cantor, Margaret Koller and Kimberley S. Fox

The New Jersey Individual Health Coverage Program (IHCP) was implemented in 1993; key provisions included pure community rating and guaranteed issue/renewal of coverage. Despite positive early evaluations, the IHCP appears to be heading for collapse. Using unique administrative and survey data, we examined trends in IHCP enrollment and premiums. We found the stability of the IHCP to be fragile in light of improving opportunities for job-related health insurance. We also found that it is retaining high-risk enrollees. Institutional realities and the difficulty of identifying a control group preclude attributing causality to the plan’s pure community rating and open enrollment provisions.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?




Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2004 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies