QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 23, no. 4 (2004): 54-67
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.4.54
© 2004 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * How Would Obama, McCain Cover The Uninsured?
 * Cost To Cover Uninsured
 * Let Health IT Market Evolve
 * How Rate Health IT Progress?
 * HIV/AIDS In India, China
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Studdert, D. M.
* Articles by Mello, M. M.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Studdert, D. M.
* Articles by Mello, M. M.
Related Collections
* State/Local Issues - California
* Consumer Issues
* Health Reform
* Legal/Regulatory Issues
* Physicians
* State/Local Issues

Malpractice Crisis

Are Damages Caps Regressive? A Study Of Malpractice Jury Verdicts In California

David M. Studdert, Y. Tony Yang and Michelle M. Mello

Caps on damages have emerged as the most controversial legislative response to the new malpractice crisis. We analyzed a sample of high-end jury verdicts in California that were subjected to the state’s $250,000 cap on noneconomic damages. We found strong evidence that the cap’s fiscal impact was distributed inequitably across different types of injuries. In absolute dollar terms, the reductions imposed on grave injury were seven times larger than those for minor injury; the largest proportional reductions were for injuries that centered on pain and disfigurement. Use of sliding scales of damages instead of or in conjunction with caps would mitigate their adverse impacts on fairness.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
T. M. Waters, P. P. Budetti, G. Claxton, and J. P. Lundy
Impact Of State Tort Reforms On Physician Malpractice Payments
Health Aff., March 1, 2007; 26(2): 500 - 509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
A. Kachalia, N. K. Choudhry, and D. M. Studdert
Physician Responses to the Malpractice Crisis: From Defense to Offense
J. Law Med. Ethics, September 1, 2005; 33(3): 416 - 428.
[PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
C. N. Kelly and M. M. Mello
Are Medical Malpractice Damages Caps Constitutional? An Overview of State Litigation
J. Law Med. Ethics, September 1, 2005; 33(3): 515 - 534.
[PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. P. Kessler, W. M. Sage, and D. J. Becker
Impact of Malpractice Reforms on the Supply of Physician Services
JAMA, June 1, 2005; 293(21): 2618 - 2625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2004 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies