| |
Securitization Of Tobacco Settlement Payments To Reduce States Conflict Of Interest
Jody Sindelar and
Tracy Falba
Securitization of the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) payments from tobacco companies is hotly debated in states and policy circles. Securitization is issuing a bond backed by future payments in return for up-front money. Many public health advocates are strongly against securitization. However, securitization itself does not rob states of tobacco control. Rather, the issue is lack of commitment to tobacco control by states. Further, securitization can mitigate states conflict of interest between keeping tobacco companies fiscally healthy to ensure their MSA payments and reducing tobacco sales for health reasons. States should not align with tobacco companies with the common interest of keeping tobacco companies fiscally healthy.

What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Cokkinides, P. Bandi, E. Ward, A. Jemal, and M. Thun
Progress and opportunities in tobacco control.
CA Cancer J Clin,
May 1, 2006;
56(3):
135 - 142.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Slama
Background information for adopting a policy encouraging earmarked tobacco and alcohol taxes for the creation of health promotion foundations
Promotion & Education,
March 1, 2006;
13(1):
8 - 13.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Slama
Informations de reference pour l'adoption d'une politique en faveur de taxes sur le tabac et l'alcool affectees a la creation de fondations de promotion de la sante
Promotion & Education,
March 1, 2006;
13(1):
22 - 28.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Slama
Informacion preparatoria para la adopcion de una politica que fomente la preasignacion de los ingresos derivados de los impuestos sobre el tabaco y el alcohol a la creacion de fundaciones de promocion de la salud
Promotion & Education,
March 1, 2006;
13(1):
38 - 44.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|