Health Affairs, 23, no. 5 (2004): 194-199 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.5.194 © 2004 by Project HOPE	New Online   Pay Cuts For Medicare Docs   Access To Care Woes   Public Coverage More Efficient   Empowering Consumers

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nyman, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nyman, J. A. Related Collections Business Of Health Insurance Coverage - Children Health Spending

Commentary

Is ‘Moral Hazard’ Inefficient? The Policy Implications Of A New Theory

"Moral hazard" refers to the additional health care that is purchased when persons become insured. Under conventional theory, health economists regard these additional health care purchases as inefficient because they represent care that is worth less to consumers than it costs to produce. A new theory, however, suggests that much of moral hazard is actually efficient. When the care that was deemed to be welfare-decreasing is reclassified as welfare-increasing, health insurance becomes much more valuable to consumers than health economists have hitherto thought it was. As a result, there is a new argument for national health insurance: efficiency.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Connor, F Elwert, C Spence, and N. Christakis Racial disparity in hospice use in the United States in 2002 Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2008; 22(3): 205 - 213. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Gomes and I. J. Higginson Where people die (1974--2030): past trends, future projections and implications for care Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2008; 22(1): 33 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. C. Schwartz, N. J. Kaslow, and W. M. McDonald Encountering Patient Suicide: A Requirement of the Residency Program Curriculum Acad Psychiatry, October 1, 2007; 31(5): 338 - 339. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Braithwaite and A. B. Rosen Linking Cost Sharing to Value: An Unrivaled Yet Unrealized Public Health Opportunity Ann Intern Med, April 17, 2007; 146(8): 602 - 605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. H. Menec, L. Lix, S. Nowicki, and O. Ekuma Health Care Use at the End of Life Among Older Adults: Does It Vary by Age? J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., April 1, 2007; 62(4): 400 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Gu, G. Liu, D. A. Vlosky, and Z. Yi Factors Associated With Place of Death Among the Chinese Oldest Old Journal of Applied Gerontology, February 1, 2007; 26(1): 34 - 57. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. K. Remler and S. A. Glied How much more cost sharing will health savings accounts bring? Health Aff., July 1, 2006; 25(4): 1070 - 1078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Kayser-Jones, A. E. Kris, C. A. Miaskowski, W. L. Lyons, and S. M. Paul Hospice Care in Nursing Homes: Does It Contribute to Higher Quality Pain Management? Gerontologist, June 1, 2006; 46(3): 325 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Barbera, L. Paszat, and C. Chartier Death in hospital for cancer patients: an indicator of quality of end-of-life care Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2005; 19(5): 435 - 436. [PDF]

				P. P Gleason, B. W Gunderson, and K. R Gericke Are Incentive-Based Formularies Inversely Associated with Drug Utilization in Managed Care? Ann. Pharmacother., February 1, 2005; 39(2): 339 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]