Health Affairs, 23, no. 6 (2004): 163-169 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.6.163 © 2004 by Project HOPE	New Online   Pay Cuts For Medicare Docs   Access To Care Woes   Public Coverage More Efficient   Empowering Consumers

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Erratum Erratum (v24,p300) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chuang, K. H. Articles by Dudley, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chuang, K. H. Articles by Dudley, R. A. Related Collections State/Local Issues - California Business Of Health Insurance Coverage Legal/Regulatory Issues

Health Tracking

TRENDS

Independent Medical Review Of Health Plan Coverage Denials: Early Trends

Concerns among patients and physicians that health plans would deny coverage for medically necessary services has brought about legislation mandating independent medical review (IMR) of denied services. Among 1,400 cases submitted in California, the most common areas for dispute were cancer care, endocrine/metabolic care (especially for obesity), orthopedic care, and neurological disorders. Surgery and pharmacy services constituted 52 percent of cases. In 58 percent of cases, IMR upheld the health plan’s decision, while in 33 percent of cases the health plan’s decision was overturned, which suggests that external IMR provides additional patient protection in California’s health care system.

                      What's this?