Health Affairs, 24, no. 1 (2005): 114-122 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.114 © 2005 by Project HOPE	New Online   McAllen, TX & Beyond: An Expert Roundtable   Geography & Reform   Medicaid or Insurance Exchange?   Siren Song of New GME   Public Plan Option: Pro & Con

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (27) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fox, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fox, D. M. Related Collections Health Reform Pharmaceuticals Physicians Quality Of Care Research And Technology Politics Evidence-Based Medicine

Evaluating Evidence

Evidence Of Evidence-Based Health Policy: The Politics Of Systematic Reviews In Coverage Decisions

U.S. policymakers are making greater use of findings from systematic reviews, the principal product of the discipline of research synthesis. This paper summarizes the methodology and availability of systematic reviews and the brief history of their introduction to policymakers in the public and private sectors and health professionals in the United States. Then, as a case study, the paper describes how officials in a consortium of states are using systematic reviews to inform decisions about coverage for pharmaceuticals. Finally, it explores the prospects for wider use of systematic reviews by policymakers.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. D. Moulton, S. L. Mercer, T. Popovic, P. A. Briss, R. A. Goodman, M. L. Thombley, R. A. Hahn, and D. M. Fox The Scientific Basis for Law as a Public Health Tool Am J Public Health, January 1, 2009; 99(1): 17 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Mundy and K. Farchaus Stein Meta-Analysis as a Basis for Evidence-Based Practice: The Question Is, Why Not? Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, August 1, 2008; 14(4): 326 - 328. [PDF]

				K. G. Bowman A Research Synthesis Overview Nurs Sci Q, April 1, 2007; 20(2): 171 - 176. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. J. Neumann Challenges Ahead For Federal Technology Assessment Health Aff., March 1, 2007; 26(2): w150 - w152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Neumann Emerging Lessons From The Drug Effectiveness Review Project Health Aff., July 1, 2006; 25(4): W262 - W271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Hansen, G. Gartlehner, K. N. Lohr, B. N. Gaynes, and T. S. Carey Efficacy and Safety of Second-Generation Antidepressants in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder Ann Intern Med, September 20, 2005; 143(6): 415 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. L. Santaguida, M. Helfand, and P. Raina Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Evaluate Drug Efficacy or Effectiveness Ann Intern Med, June 21, 2005; 142(12_Part_2): 1066 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Young Policymakers, experts review evidence-based medicine Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., February 15, 2005; 62(4): 342 - 343. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Helfand Using Evidence Reports: Progress And Challenges In Evidence-Based Decision Making Health Aff., January 1, 2005; 24(1): 123 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]