Health Affairs

Health Affairs, 24, no. 1 (2005): 133-136 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.133 © 2005 by Project HOPE	New Online   Getting Health Reform Done   After the State of the Union   Incremental Reform   E-Health in Developing World   Most-Read Articles in 2009

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mendelson, D. Articles by Carino, T. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mendelson, D. Articles by Carino, T. V. Related Collections Health Reform Medicare Pharmaceuticals Physicians Quality Of Care Research And Technology Politics Evidence-Based Medicine

Evaluating Evidence

PERSPECTIVE

Evidence-Based Medicine In The United States—De Rigueur Or Dream Deferred?

Dan Mendelson and Tanisha V. Carino

Although evidence-based medicine (EBM) is an important concept for promoting value in health care, meaningful application of EBM tools in commercial settings has proceeded slowly. Barriers to the use of EBM include patient preference, physician resistance, the lack of automated decision support systems, managed care failures, lack of research on which to base decisions, and the inherent subjectivity of interpretations of evidence. Political concern has mirrored these barriers; consequently, Medicare still lacks clear authority to apply many evidence-based decision tools. Dialogue and consensus will be critical in bridging public concern and the eagerness of researchers to apply EBM.

                      What's this?