| |
Evidence-Based Practice As Mental Health Policy: Three Controversies And A Caveat
Sandra J. Tanenbaum
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the subject of vigorous controversy in the field of mental health. In this paper I discuss three distinct but interrelated controversies: how inclusive the mental health evidence base should be; whether mental health practice is a variety of applied science; and when and how the effectiveness goal in mental health is defined. I provide examples of evidence-based policy in mental health. These controversies pertain as well to general medicine. To the extent that they remain unresolved, evidence-based policy making may lead to ineffective and limited care.

What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Mullen, S. E. Bledsoe, and J. L. Bellamy
Implementing Evidence-Based Social Work Practice
Research on Social Work Practice,
July 1, 2008;
18(4):
325 - 338.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. B. Sullivan
Evidence-Based Practices in Mental Health: Debate and Dialogue on the Fundamental Questions
Psychiatr Serv,
June 1, 2007;
58(6):
882 - 883.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Hilarski
Book Review: Cognitive Therapy for Challenging Problems: What to Do When the Basics Don't Work.
Research on Social Work Practice,
September 1, 2006;
16(5):
540 - 542.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C Waddell and R Godderis
Rethinking evidence-based practice for children's mental health
Evid. Based Ment. Health,
August 1, 2005;
8(3):
60 - 62.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|