Health Affairs, 24, no. 1 (2005): 220-227
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.220
© 2005 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Getting Health Reform Done
 * After the State of the Union
 * Incremental Reform
 * E-Health in Developing World
 * Most-Read Articles in 2009
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Sloan, F. A.
* Articles by Mathews, C. A.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Sloan, F. A.
* Articles by Mathews, C. A.
Related Collections
* Health Promotion/Disease Prevention
* Legal/Regulatory Issues
* Mental Health/Substance Abuse
* Chronic Care
* State/Local Issues
* Politics
* Determinants Of Health

Health Tracking

MARKETWATCH

States’ Allocations Of Funds From The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement

Frank A. Sloan, Jennifer S. Allsbrook, Leanne K. Madre, Leah E. Masselink and Carrie A. Mathews

This study assesses six states’ allocation decisions for funds from tobacco settlement agreements, using information from newspaper articles and other public sources. State allocation decisions were diverse; substantial shares were allocated to areas other than tobacco control and health, including capital projects and budget shortfalls. The allocations did not reflect the stated goals of the lawsuits leading to the settlements. This outcome reflects a lack of strong advocacy from public health interest groups, an unreliable public constituency for tobacco control, and inconsistent support from state executive and legislative branches, all combined with sizable budget deficits that provided competing uses for settlement funds.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
F. A. Sloan, E. S. Carlisle, J. R. Rattliff, and J. Trogdon
Determinants of States' Allocations of the Master Settlement Agreement Payments
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, August 1, 2005; 30(4): 643 - 686.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
T. R. Frieden
FRIEDEN RESPONDS
Am J Public Health, June 1, 2005; 95(6): 931 - 932.
[Full Text] [PDF]