QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 24, no. 4 (2005): 1032-1038
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.1032
© 2005 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * How Would Obama, McCain Cover The Uninsured?
 * Debating Cost Of Uninsured
 * Try Medicare-For-All
 * HA Blog Top 10
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Morden, N. E.
* Articles by Sullivan, S. D.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Morden, N. E.
* Articles by Sullivan, S. D.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Business Of Health
* Consumer Issues
* Health Reform
* Managed Care - Medicaid
* Managed Care - Medicare
* Medicaid
* Medicare
* Pharmaceuticals
* State/Local Issues
* Health Spending

Health Tracking

MARKETWATCH

States’ Control Of Prescription Drug Spending: A Heterogeneous Approach

Nancy E. Morden and Sean D. Sullivan

In an effort to balance Medicaid budgets, states use prescription drug cost containment tools in unique ways and in varying combinations. We report on the variability in state-level strategies to control the cost of prescription drugs and describe broad state-to-state differences in per beneficiary spending on drugs. This heterogeneity raises the question of appropriate state program variability. Research is needed to determine the medically, ethically, and legally most suitable means of controlling drug costs, especially as the Medicare Part D drug plan will likely recapitulate the prescription drug program variability observed among the states.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. R. Rahimi, J. A. Spertus, K. J. Reid, S. M. Bernheim, and H. M. Krumholz
Financial Barriers to Health Care and Outcomes After Acute Myocardial Infarction
JAMA, March 14, 2007; 297(10): 1063 - 1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
J. M. Paterson, A. Laupacis, K. Bassett, G. M. Anderson, and for the BC-Ontario Pharmacosurveillance for Decisi
Using Pharmacoepidemiology To Inform Drug Coverage Policy: Initial Lessons From A Two-Province Collaborative
Health Aff., September 1, 2006; 25(5): 1436 - 1443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
P. J. Neumann
Emerging Lessons From The Drug Effectiveness Review Project
Health Aff., July 1, 2006; 25(4): W262 - W271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2005 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies