QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 24, no. 4 (2005): 961-971
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.961
© 2005 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * McAllen, TX & Beyond: An Expert Roundtable
 * Geography & Reform
 * Medicaid or Insurance Exchange?
 * Siren Song of New GME
 * Public Plan Option: Pro & Con
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Gilmer, T.
* Articles by Young, E.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* Articles by Gilmer, T.
* Articles by Young, E.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Ethical Issues
* Hospitals
* Legal/Regulatory Issues
* Business Of Health
* Quality Of Care
* Research And Technology
* Health Spending
* Politics
* Consumer Issues

End-of-Life Care

The Costs Of Nonbeneficial Treatment In The Intensive Care Setting

Todd Gilmer, Lawrence J. Schneiderman, Holly Teetzel, Jeffrey Blustein, Kathleen Briggs, Felicia Cohn, Ronald Cranford, Daniel Dugan, Glen Komatsu and Ernlé Young

Ethics consultations have been shown to reduce the use of "nonbeneficial treatments," defined as life-sustaining treatments delivered to patients who ultimately did not survive to hospital discharge, when treatment conflicts occurred in the adult intensive care unit (ICU). In this paper we estimated the costs of nonbeneficial treatment using the results from a randomized trial of ethics consultations. We found that ethics consultations were associated with reductions in hospital days and treatment costs among patients who did not survive to hospital discharge. We conclude that consultations resolved conflicts that would have inappropriately prolonged nonbeneficial or unwanted treatments in the ICU instead of focusing on more appropriate comfort care.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
Y-Y Chen and Y-C Chen
Evaluating ethics consultation: randomised controlled trial is not the right tool
J. Med. Ethics, August 1, 2008; 34(8): 594 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A Bernardi, A Jirillo, R Pegoraro, and M. Bonavina
Allocation of public sources in oncology: which role can ethics play?
Ann. Onc., July 1, 2007; 18(7): 1129 - 1131.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
L. A. Hampson and E. J. Emanuel
The Prognosis For Changes In End-Of-Life Care After The Schiavo Case
Health Aff., July 1, 2005; 24(4): 972 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
R. M. Veatch
Terri Schiavo, Son Hudson, And 'Nonbeneficial' Medical Treatments
Health Aff., July 1, 2005; 24(4): 976 - 979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2005 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies