Health Affairs, 24, no. 4 (2005): 972-975 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.972 © 2005 by Project HOPE	New Online   How Would Obama, McCain Cover The Uninsured?   Cost To Cover Uninsured   Let Health IT Market Evolve   How Rate Health IT Progress?   HIV/AIDS In India, China

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hampson, L. A. Articles by Emanuel, E. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hampson, L. A. Articles by Emanuel, E. J. Related Collections Access To Care Business Of Health Consumer Issues Legal/Regulatory Issues Mental Health/Substance Abuse Physicians Politics

End-of-Life Care

PERSPECTIVE

The Prognosis For Changes In End-Of-Life Care After The Schiavo Case

Americans have reached consensus that (1) people have a right to refuse life-sustaining medical interventions, and (2) interventions that can be terminated include artificial nutrition and hydration. The one unresolved issue is how to decide for mentally incompetent patients. Only about 20 percent of Americans have completed living wills, and data show that family members are poor at predicting patients’ wishes for life-sustaining care. But despite court cases and national consensus that these are private and not legislative matters, the Schiavo case is unlikely to change practices except to increase the number of Americans who complete living wills.

                      What's this?