QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 24, no. 5 (2005): 1234-1245
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1234
© 2005 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Pay Cuts For Medicare Docs
 * Access To Care Woes
 * Public Coverage More Efficient
 * Empowering Consumers
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Technical Executive Summary
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Taylor, R.
* Articles by Hillestad, R.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Taylor, R.
* Articles by Hillestad, R.
Related Collections
* Health Reform
* Health Information Technology
* Quality Of Care
* Research And Technology
* Health Spending
* Politics

Health Information Technology Policy

Promoting Health Information Technology: Is There A Case For More-Aggressive Government Action?

Roger Taylor, Anthony Bower, Federico Girosi, James Bigelow, Kateryna Fonkych and Richard Hillestad

Health information technology (HIT) could save $81–$162 billion or more annually while greatly reducing morbidity and mortality. However, gaining these benefits requires broad adoption, effective implementation, and associated changes in health care processes and structures. The policy options that could speed the adoption of HIT and the realization of these benefits include incentives to promote standard-based electronic medical record (EMR) system adoption; subsidies to develop information-exchange networks; and programs to measure, report, and reward performance. Investments in these and other identified policy options should pay for themselves while also laying the foundation for needed transformation of the U.S. health care system.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
M. O'Kane, J. Corrigan, S. M. Foote, S. R. Tunis, G. J. Isham, L. M. Nichols, E. S. Fisher, J. C. Ebeler, J. A. Block, B. E. Bradley, et al.
Crossroads In Quality
Health Aff., May 1, 2008; 27(3): 749 - 758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. A. Spooner and and the Council on Clinical Information Technology
Special Requirements of Electronic Health Record Systems in Pediatrics
Pediatrics, March 1, 2007; 119(3): 631 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
K. Fiscella and H. J. Geiger
Health information technology and quality improvement for community health centers.
Health Aff., March 1, 2006; 25(2): 405 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
R. Hillestad, J. Bigelow, A. Bower, F. Girosi, R. Meili, R. Scoville, and R. Taylor
Can Electronic Medical Record Systems Transform Health Care? Potential Health Benefits, Savings, And Costs
Health Aff., September 1, 2005; 24(5): 1103 - 1117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
A. G. Bower
Federal Investment In Health Information Technology: How To Motivate It?
Health Aff., September 1, 2005; 24(5): 1263 - 1265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2005 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies