Health Affairs

Health Affairs, 24, no. 5 (2005): 1234-1245 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1234 © 2005 by Project HOPE	New Online   Reinhardt: Post-Summit   Report from the Summit   President's Reform Proposal   Rising Medicare Costs   Spending for Immigrants   $2.5 Trillion U.S. Health Tab   Child Obesity Briefing

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Technical Executive Summary Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Taylor, R. Articles by Hillestad, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Taylor, R. Articles by Hillestad, R. Related Collections Health Reform Quality Of Care Research And Technology Health Spending Politics Health Information Technology

Health Information Technology Policy

Promoting Health Information Technology: Is There A Case For More-Aggressive Government Action?

Roger Taylor, Anthony Bower, Federico Girosi, James Bigelow, Kateryna Fonkych and Richard Hillestad

Health information technology (HIT) could save $81–$162 billion or more annually while greatly reducing morbidity and mortality. However, gaining these benefits requires broad adoption, effective implementation, and associated changes in health care processes and structures. The policy options that could speed the adoption of HIT and the realization of these benefits include incentives to promote standard-based electronic medical record (EMR) system adoption; subsidies to develop information-exchange networks; and programs to measure, report, and reward performance. Investments in these and other identified policy options should pay for themselves while also laying the foundation for needed transformation of the U.S. health care system.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. O'Kane, J. Corrigan, S. M. Foote, S. R. Tunis, G. J. Isham, L. M. Nichols, E. S. Fisher, J. C. Ebeler, J. A. Block, B. E. Bradley, et al. Crossroads In Quality Health Aff., May 1, 2008; 27(3): 749 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Spooner and and the Council on Clinical Information Technology Special Requirements of Electronic Health Record Systems in Pediatrics Pediatrics, March 1, 2007; 119(3): 631 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Fiscella and H. J. Geiger Health information technology and quality improvement for community health centers. Health Aff., March 1, 2006; 25(2): 405 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Hillestad, J. Bigelow, A. Bower, F. Girosi, R. Meili, R. Scoville, and R. Taylor Can Electronic Medical Record Systems Transform Health Care? Potential Health Benefits, Savings, And Costs Health Aff., September 1, 2005; 24(5): 1103 - 1117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G. Bower Federal Investment In Health Information Technology: How To Motivate It? Health Aff., September 1, 2005; 24(5): 1263 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]