Health Affairs, 24, no. 5 (2005): 1344-1355
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1344
© 2005 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Getting Health Reform Done
 * After the State of the Union
 * Incremental Reform
 * E-Health in Developing World
 * Most-Read Articles in 2009
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Mitchell, J. B.
* Articles by Hoover, S.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Mitchell, J. B.
* Articles by Hoover, S.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Health Reform
* Insurance Coverage
* Insurance Coverage - Children
* Medicaid
* State/Local Issues
* Consumer Issues
* Insurance Market

DataWatch

Premium Subsidy Programs: Who Enrolls, And How Do They Fare?

Janet B. Mitchell, Susan G. Haber and Sonja Hoover

Little is known about who enrolls in state premium subsidy programs or enrollees’ experiences. This study surveyed parents of children enrolled in two programs with identical income eligibility requirements: Oregon’s State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) and its premium subsidy program (FHIAP). Parents choosing FHIAP were more likely to be employed, to speak English, to have prior experience with premiums and private health insurance, and to perceive insurance as protection against future health care needs. Despite copayment requirements and more restricted benefits in FHIAP, there were few differences in access to care between children enrolled in the two programs.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?