QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 24, no. 6 (2005): 1592-1600
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.6.1592
© 2005 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * McAllen, TX & Beyond: An Expert Roundtable
 * Geography & Reform
 * Medicaid or Insurance Exchange?
 * Siren Song of New GME
 * Public Plan Option: Pro & Con
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Online Supplemental Table
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Rosenthal, M.
* Articles by Milstein, A.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Rosenthal, M.
* Articles by Milstein, A.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Health Reform
* Insurance Coverage
* Managed Care
* Managed Care - Consumers
* Business Of Health
* Health Spending
* Consumer Issues
* Insurance Market

Health Tracking

MARKETWATCH

A Report Card On The Freshman Class Of Consumer-Directed Health Plans

Meredith Rosenthal, Charleen Hsuan and Arnold Milstein

We used a series of case studies of first-generation consumer-directed health plans to investigate their early experience and the suitability of their design for reducing the growth in health benefit spending and improving the value of that spending. We found three fundamental but correctible weaknesses: Most plans do not make available comparative measures of quality and longitudinal cost-efficiency in enough detail to help consumers discern higher-value health care options; financial incentives for consumers are weak and insensitive to differences in value among the selections that consumers make; and none of the plans made cost-sharing adjustments to preserve freedom of choice for low-income consumers.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
C. L. Barry, M. R. Cullen, D. Galusha, M. D. Slade, and S. H. Busch
Who Chooses A Consumer-Directed Health Plan?
Health Aff., November 1, 2008; 27(6): 1671 - 1679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
S.-L. T. Normand, R. E. Wolf, and B. J. McNeil
Discriminating Quality of Hospital Care in the United States
Med Decis Making, June 1, 2008; 28(3): 308 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
M. B. Buntin, C. Damberg, A. Haviland, K. Kapur, N. Lurie, R. McDevitt, and M. S. Marquis
Consumer-Directed Health Care: Early Evidence About Effects On Cost And Quality
Health Aff., November 1, 2006; 25(6): w516 - w530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. Blumenthal
Employer-sponsored insurance--riding the health care tiger.
N. Engl. J. Med., July 13, 2006; 355(2): 195 - 202.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2005 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies