Health Affairs, 24, no. 6 (2005): 1611-1618
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.6.1611
© 2005 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Getting Health Reform Done
 * After the State of the Union
 * Incremental Reform
 * E-Health in Developing World
 * Most-Read Articles in 2009
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Technical Appendix
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Sommers, B. D.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Sommers, B. D.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Health Reform
* Managed Care - Medicaid
* Maternal And Child Health
* Medicaid
* Business Of Health
* Safety-Net Systems
* State/Local Issues
* Consumer Issues

Health Tracking

TRENDS

The Impact Of Program Structure On Children’s Disenrollment From Medicaid And SCHIP

Benjamin D. Sommers

Program fragmentation might exacerbate disenrollment of children from Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). Using data from 2001–2004, I estimated the number of children who switched programs and the number who "dropped out" of public insurance—becoming uninsured despite continuing eligibility. Roughly two million children a year switched programs; 12.5 percent a year dropped out of Medicaid, and 15.6 percent a year dropped out of SCHIP. Children in states with separate SCHIP and Medicaid programs were 45 percent more likely to drop out. This effect persisted after controlling for demographic and policy variables. Administering multiple distinct public insurance programs appears to be counterproductive in terms of retention.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
B. D. Sommers
Why Millions Of Children Eligible For Medicaid And SCHIP Are Uninsured: Poor Retention Versus Poor Take-Up
Health Aff., September 1, 2007; 26(5): w560 - w567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
A. S. Sommers, L. Dubay, L. J. Blumberg, F. E. Blavin, and J. L. Czajka
Dynamics In Medicaid And SCHIP Eligibility Among Children In SCHIP's Early Years: Implications For Reauthorization
Health Aff., September 1, 2007; 26(5): w598 - w607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]