QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 24, no. 6 (2005): 1629-1639
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.6.1629
© 2005 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Senate Health Reform Bill
 * Rewarding Providers
 * Public Option Policy Brief
 * Health Reform & Abortion
 * Delivery System Reform
This Article
* Figures Only
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Technical Supplement
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Kahn, J. G.
* Articles by Gans, D. N.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Kahn, J. G.
* Articles by Gans, D. N.
Related Collections
* Hospitals
* Legal/Regulatory Issues
* Business Of Health
* Physicians
* State/Local Issues
* Health Spending
* State/Local Issues - California

DataWatch

The Cost Of Health Insurance Administration In California: Estimates For Insurers, Physicians, And Hospitals

James G. Kahn, Richard Kronick, Mary Kreger and David N. Gans

Administrative costs account for 25 percent of health care spending, but little is known about the portion attributable to billing and insurance-related (BIR) functions. We estimated BIR for hospital and physician care in California. Data for physician practices came from a mail survey and interviews; for hospitals, from regulatory reporting; and for private insurers, from a consulting company. Private insurers spend 9.9 percent of revenue on administration and 8 percent on BIR. Physician offices spend 27 percent and 14 percent, and hospitals, 21 percent and 7–11 percent, respectively. Overall, BIR represents 20–22 percent of privately insured spending in California acute care settings.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Oncol PractHome page
J. M. Luna, P. W. Thurman, M. Wolfe, D. Yagoda, E. Reed, and W. D. Figg Sr
Private Practice Administrative Costs Influenced by Insurance Payer Mix
J. Oncol. Pract, November 1, 2009; 5(6): 291 - 297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
L. P. Casalino, S. Nicholson, D. N. Gans, T. Hammons, D. Morra, T. Karrison, and W. Levinson
What Does It Cost Physician Practices To Interact With Health Insurance Plans?
Health Aff., July 1, 2009; 28(4): w533 - w543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
J. A. Sakowski, J. G. Kahn, R. G. Kronick, J. M. Newman, and H. S. Luft
Peering Into The Black Box: Billing And Insurance Activities In A Medical Group
Health Aff., July 1, 2009; 28(4): w544 - w554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
K. Davis, C. Schoen, K. Shea, and C. Haran
Aiming High for the U.S. Health System: A Context for Health Reform.
J. Law Med. Ethics, December 1, 2008; 36(4): 629 - 643.
[PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
L. L. Berry, A. M. Mirabito, S. Williams, and F. Davidoff
A Physicians' Agenda for Partnering With Employers and Insurers: Fresh Ideas
Mayo Clin. Proc., December 1, 2006; 81(12): 1592 - 1602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2005 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies