Health Affairs, 25, no. 1 (2006): 278-283 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.1.278 © 2006 by Project HOPE	New Online   McAllen, TX & Beyond: An Expert Roundtable   Geography & Reform   Medicaid or Insurance Exchange?   Siren Song of New GME   Public Plan Option: Pro & Con

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bismark, M. Articles by Paterson, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bismark, M. Articles by Paterson, R. Related Collections International Issues Legal/Regulatory Issues Quality Of Care Consumer Issues

UpDate

UPDATE: INTERNATIONAL REPORT

No-Fault Compensation In New Zealand: Harmonizing Injury Compensation, Provider Accountability, And Patient Safety

In 1974 New Zealand jettisoned a tort-based system for compensating medical injuries in favor of a government-funded compensation system. Although the system retained some residual fault elements, it essentially barred medical malpractice litigation. Reforms in 2005 expanded eligibility for compensation to all "treatment injuries," creating a true no-fault compensation system. Compared with a medical malpractice system, the New Zealand system offers more-timely compensation to a greater number of injured patients and more-effective processes for complaint resolution and provider accountability. The unfinished business lies in realizing its full potential for improving patient safety.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				U M Thatte, R Kulkarni-Munshi, and S A Kalekar Review of policies for injuries to research participants in India J. Med. Ethics, February 1, 2009; 35(2): 133 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Croxson Fundamental similarities between tort and administrative systems for managing health care accidents J Health Serv Res Policy, October 1, 2008; 13(4): 193 - 194. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J L Glasgow, S R McLennan, K J High, and L A G Celi Quality of dying in a New Zealand teaching hospital Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2008; 17(4): 244 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. McLean and E. P. Richards Teleradiology: A Case Study Of The Economic And Legal Considerations In International Trade In Telemedicine Health Aff., September 1, 2006; 25(5): 1378 - 1385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M Bismark Compensation and complaints in New Zealand. BMJ, May 6, 2006; 332(7549): 1095 - 1095. [Full Text]