| |
Follow-On Biologics: Ensuring Continued Innovation In The Biotechnology Industry
Bruce S. Manheim, Jr.,
Patricia Granahan and
Kenneth J. Dow
Congress adopted legislation in 1984 to encourage pharmaceutical companies to develop new drugs, while simultaneously allowing competitors to bring cheaper generic versions to market. More than twenty years later, Congress may be faced with a similar balancing act for biologics. When Congress takes up this issue, it must focus on the substantial differences that exist between biologics and drugs. It should also evaluate the patent law, which is yielding increasingly narrow patents. If additional measures are not adopted in light of the intersection of these factors, then any legislation allowing for "follow-on" biologics could stifle development of new medicines from biotechnology.

What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Calfee and E. DuPre
The Emerging Market Dynamics Of Targeted Therapeutics
Health Aff.,
September 1, 2006;
25(5):
1302 - 1308.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. B. Watkins, S. R. Choudhury, E. Wong, and S. D. Sullivan
Managing Biotechnology In A Network-Model Health Plan: A U.S. Private Payer Perspective
Health Aff.,
September 1, 2006;
25(5):
1347 - 1352.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|