Health Affairs, 25, no. 3 (2006): 730-733 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.3.730 © 2006 by Project HOPE	New Online   House Health Reform Bill   Paying for Reform   Vetting AHIP's Report   HIV/AIDS Costs   Brief: Insurance Reform   HA Blog Top 10

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bernstein, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bernstein, R. Related Collections Access To Care Ethical Issues Legal/Regulatory Issues Mental Health/Substance Abuse Chronic Care Consumer Issues

Regulation & Policy

PERSPECTIVE

A Seat At The Table: Trend Or Illusion?

Responding to Nancy Tomes’s conclusion that mental health consumers are beneficiaries but not primary causes of a new attentiveness to consumers’ concerns, this review finds various historical and contemporary reasons for the mental health consumer movement to remain vigilant: the system’s shallow acceptance of consumer self-determination; continued reliance on expedient coercive tactics rather than therapeutic engagement; the currently narrow reach of initiatives in self-direction; and the fragmentation of authority in the delivery of public services and supports needed by mental health consumers.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Bernstein Commentary: The Climate for Physician Adherence to Psychiatric Advance Directives J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, September 1, 2006; 34(3): 402 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]