Health Affairs, 25, no. 3 (2006): 737-749
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.3.737
© 2006 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Getting Health Reform Done
 * After the State of the Union
 * Incremental Reform
 * E-Health in Developing World
 * Most-Read Articles in 2009
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Goldman, H. H.
* Articles by Grob, G. N.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Goldman, H. H.
* Articles by Grob, G. N.
Related Collections
* Legal/Regulatory Issues
* Mental Health/Substance Abuse
* Consumer Issues

Regulation & Policy

Defining ‘Mental Illness’ In Mental Health Policy

Howard H. Goldman and Gerald N. Grob

Mental health policy is shaped fundamentally by the definition of mental illness associated with the policy. Changing policies reflect changing definitions. At various times, the definition may be narrow or broad with respect to the scope of conditions covered by a specific policy. The priority accorded to impairment severity is the most crucial and enduring policy issue related to the definition of mental illness and the scope of that definition. This paper explores the role of definitions in framing mental health policy, using examples from the history of policy making over the past half-century.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?