Health Affairs, 25, no. 4 (2006): w312-w315
(Published online 20 June 2006)
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w312
© 2006 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Getting Health Reform Done
 * After the State of the Union
 * Incremental Reform
 * E-Health in Developing World
 * Most-Read Articles in 2009
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Hyman, D. A.
* Articles by Sage, W. M.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Hyman, D. A.
* Articles by Sage, W. M.
Related Collections
* Hospitals
* Legal/Regulatory Issues
* Business Of Health
* Nonprofit/For-Profit Status
* Consumer Issues

Web Exclusives

PERSPECTIVE

Subsidizing Health Care Providers Through The Tax Code: Status Or Conduct?

David A. Hyman and William M. Sage

The merits of tax exemption for nonprofit health care providers have been hotly debated for decades. Mark Schlesinger and Brad Gray provide a useful, dispassionate meta-analysis of past research; they conclude that there are real differences in the performance of nonprofit and for-profit hospitals and nursing homes, although they vary along several key dimensions. Unfortunately, their findings offer no insight on whether these differences are large enough to justify a sizable subsidy and whether it makes more sense to use an undifferentiated subsidy tied to status (current practice), or a graduated subsidy tied to quantifiable and objective measures of performance.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?