QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 25, no. 5 (2006): 1231-1239
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.5.1231
© 2006 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * McAllen, TX & Beyond: An Expert Roundtable
 * Geography & Reform
 * Medicaid or Insurance Exchange?
 * Siren Song of New GME
 * Public Plan Option: Pro & Con
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Erratum
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Carino, T.
* Articles by Bridger, P.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Carino, T.
* Articles by Bridger, P.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Insurance Coverage
* Managed Care - Medicare
* Medicare
* Business Of Health
* Pharmaceuticals
* Research And Technology
* Health Spending
* Consumer Issues
* Insurance Market
* Evidence-Based Medicine

Coverage

Medicare’s Coverage Of Colorectal Cancer Drugs: A Case Study In Evidence Development And Policy

Tanisha Carino, Reginald D. Williams, II, Allison M. Colbert and Perry Bridger

Payers point to the lack of unbiased evidence for making coverage decisions for new and often costly technologies. This paper provides a case study of a new approach to developing information to meet the needs of a payer: Medicare’s coverage with evidence development (CED) policy. Medicare’s decision to condition coverage of cancer therapies on clinical trial participation is an early application of CED and signals Medicare’s interest in developing evidence on new technologies for beneficiaries. This paper reviews the rationale and challenges Medicare faces in applying its CED policy and discusses the implications of payers’ using and generating evidence.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
P. J. Neumann, M. S. Kamae, and J. A. Palmer
Medicare's National Coverage Decisions For Technologies, 1999-2007
Health Aff., November 1, 2008; 27(6): 1620 - 1631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
R. F. Redberg
Evidence, Appropriateness, And Technology Assessment In Cardiology: A Case Study Of Computed Tomography
Health Aff., January 1, 2007; 26(1): 86 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
S. R. Tunis and S. D. Pearson
Coverage Options For Promising Technologies: Medicare's 'Coverage With Evidence Development'
Health Aff., September 1, 2006; 25(5): 1218 - 1230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
P. S. Keenan, P. J. Neumann, and K. A. Phillips
Biotechnology And Medicare's New Technology Policy: Lessons From Three Case Studies
Health Aff., September 1, 2006; 25(5): 1260 - 1269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2006 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies