Health Affairs, 25, no. 5 (2006): 1249-1259
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.5.1249
© 2006 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Getting Health Reform Done
 * After the State of the Union
 * Incremental Reform
 * E-Health in Developing World
 * Most-Read Articles in 2009
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Cotter, D.
* Articles by Bullock, K.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Cotter, D.
* Articles by Bullock, K.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Insurance Coverage
* Managed Care - Medicare
* Medicare
* Business Of Health
* Pharmaceuticals
* Research And Technology
* Health Spending
* Consumer Issues
* Insurance Market
* Evidence-Based Medicine

Coverage

Translating Epoetin Research Into Practice: The Role Of Government And The Use Of Scientific Evidence

Dennis Cotter, Mae Thamer, Krishnan Narasimhan, Yi Zhang and Kim Bullock

Spending for epoetin is Medicare’s single largest drug expenditure. We chronicle the evolution of epoetin policy based on a lack of well-designed post–Food and Drug Administration approval studies demonstrating clinical benefit; congressional/federal agency reliance on clinical practice guidelines that might have misinterpreted evidence supporting causality; and the premature translation of research into practice and policy. Were the right choices made? Epoetin showcases the risk and benefit conundrum created when evidentiary standards are relaxed. Our review concludes with broad-based policy recommendations for the newly implemented Medicare Part D program.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
A. K. Singh
Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2008; 3(1): 3 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. Thamer, Y. Zhang, J. Kaufman, D. Cotter, F. Dong, and M. A. Hernan
Dialysis Facility Ownership and Epoetin Dosing in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis
JAMA, April 18, 2007; 297(15): 1667 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
H. S. Luft
Universal Health Care Coverage: A Potential Hybrid Solution
JAMA, March 14, 2007; 297(10): 1115 - 1118.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. Shaldon
Does erythropoetin improve survival in ESRD haemodialysis patients?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 962 - 962.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. Shaldon
The use of IV iron in the treatment of anaemia of ESRD patients on maintenance haemodialysis: an historical and personal view
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 23 - 25.
[Full Text] [PDF]